πŸ›Έ About UF Oh My Gosh

We believe the search for truth about UFOs and UAPs deserves rigorous, unbiased analysis β€” not sensationalism or dismissal.

🎯 Our Mission

UF Oh My Gosh was created to fill a gap in UFO/UAP journalism. We aggregate news from multiple sources and apply consistent, transparent analysis to help readers distinguish credible reports from speculation.

We don't advocate for any particular theory. Whether UAPs are advanced human technology, natural phenomena, or something else entirely β€” we present the evidence and let you decide.

βš–οΈ Our Values

πŸ”

Evidence-Based

Every claim is evaluated against the available evidence. We score based on verifiable facts, not belief or speculation.

πŸ“Š

Transparent

Our scoring methodology is fully documented. You can see exactly how we arrive at our credibility assessments.

🎯

Unbiased

We neither promote nor debunk. Our goal is factual reporting, regardless of whether findings support any particular narrative.

πŸ“š Our Sources

We aggregate news from a variety of source types, each with assigned reliability ratings:

πŸ›οΈ
Government Sources (90-95)
Pentagon, Congress, AARO, NASA, ODNI
πŸ“°
Major News Networks (85-92)
NYT, Washington Post, BBC, Reuters, AP News
πŸ”¬
Scientific Publications (80-95)
Nature, Science, arXiv, peer-reviewed journals
πŸ›Έ
UFO Organizations (65-80)
MUFON, NUFORC, The Debrief, specialty outlets

πŸ€– Our Technology

πŸ“‘

Automated Aggregation

We continuously monitor news APIs and RSS feeds to gather the latest UFO/UAP coverage as it happens.

🧠

Multi-Agent AI Debate

Five specialized AI analysts β€” Evidence, Source Investigation, Scientific Skepticism, Historical Archives, and Government Disclosure β€” independently analyse each article, cross-examine disagreements, and reach a consensus verdict. Every analysis is backed by retrieval across our knowledge graph of connected cases, evidence types, and sources.

πŸ“Š

Agent-Consensus Scoring

Credibility scores are determined by multi-agent consensus across our 5-factor framework β€” not a single-model pass. Agents debate evidence quality, source reliability, corroboration, official acknowledgment, and expert analysis.

Ready to explore?